Living in the so-called “age of reason “necessitates having something ,an apriori statement, from which to reason. Otherwise “unreason” is just as valid as reason and anyone’s reasoning will suffice.
Living in the so-called “age of reason “necessitates having something ,an apriori statement, from which to reason. Otherwise “unreason” is just as valid as reason and anyone’s reasoning will suffice.
Do we not reason from our world/life view? Our “apriori statement” must be valid within our view, no?
P.S. Joe, have you considered Don’s suggestion of a glossary tab on top? Every paradigm needs it’s lexicon.