Q&A #5

This is a tricky one gang. Please answer all three parts:
Q&A 5a. A body that is not expressing innate intelligence is said to be a) dead, b) in a state of DIS-EASE c)Other
Q&A 5b. An organ that is not expressing innate intelligence FULLY is said to be a)dead, b) in a state of DIS-EASE? c)Other
Q&A 5c. A single cell not expressing the innate intelligence of the body is said to be a)dead, b) in a state of DIS-EASE. c)Other
Please explain the basis for your answers to ALL three parts.

P.S. If you don’t send questions, I’ll keep making up my own and I have 15 years experience making up tough questions!

4 thoughts on “Q&A #5”

  1. 5a. dead. body means matter is present. not expressing intelligence means intelligence it’s not animating matter, so therefore i think the body is dead.

    5b. in a state of dis-ease. this pretty sums up why you and i are in business.

    5c. dead. when you say “not expressing” that means to me, dead. when you say “not fully expressing” that means subluxated and dis-eased. i can picture reggie brushing off his arm and brushing off dead skin cells.

    i’m sure we can get really tricky with those but that’s just off the cuff very quickly.

    Reply
  2. 5a). a.
    5b). c. It is my understanding that DIS-EASE refers to the whole body being in a state of incoordination.
    5c.). c. A single cell (ex. cancer cell) can still express intelligence (cellular intelligence), but not be working/expressing with the innate intelligence of the body for it would not harm the body.

    Reply
  3. This question is only tricky if one is affected by the level of organization within matter of Innate Intelligence. The criteria for Innate Intelligence being in contact with it’s tissues and to what degree never changes…the perception of this criteria can.

    Reply

Leave a Comment