The difference between a mental impulse and a vibration

The quality of the mental impulse is dependent first on the (perfect) intelligence organizing it and then the quality of the matter conveying its material aspect. Further, the matter cannot improve upon it (since it is already perfect). It can only distort or lessen  its quality.

A vibration, on the other hand, as D.D. and B.J. present it, is a universal force. It has no quality to it and like any universal force, it is destructive toward structural matter and must be adapted by the innate intelligence of the body. The question is, where does that adaptation take place?

2 thoughts on “The difference between a mental impulse and a vibration”

  1. I have understood it that adaptation can only occur where there is innate intelligence. In the body, it would occur everywhere. The ii adapts/transforms the ui forces into “life” forces that the NS can interpret. The NS can then react accordingly to enable ii to be expressed through the body more perfectly.

    Reply
  2. It seems to me that universal forces do have a quality that is imparted to them via universal intelligence. That quality or information is impressed upon the matter, the matter senses the information/force, converts it to a mental force propogated along the afferent nerve to the brain cell and innate brain. The traditional philosophy would indicate that adaptation occurs then at the innate brain which then communicates to the matter how to respond to demand and supply. Equally plausible is that innate intelligence is in all cells and that adaptation occurs at the cellular level first, relayed to the innate brain and then the innate brain instructs the original matter and entire organism how to respond appropriately for the overall survival of the organism.

    Reply

Leave a Comment