Stupid Statements #109

9 thoughts on “Stupid Statements #109”

  1. Is “getting adjusted” by an OSC a GOOD thing or a BAD thing?
    Does using ones Will for self knowledge, expression, improvement? (Now there’s a debatable term) provide More Adio Or Oibu viewpoint?
    Is becoming Educated an aquiring experience or a sheading experience? When is a tool a crutch?
    New Age vs Old Age? Man vs Origin? Is it All Good or is there truly Evil?

    Reply
  2. The sublixation itself is always bad. The measurable adaptation related to the interference is always good. When these concepts are intermixed together as “subluxation”, that’s when there is confusion.

    Reply
    • The TSC ASSumes in confusion that the subluxation is always corrected and/or the resultant “measurable adaptation” through research is also good. OSC makes no assumption beyond LACVS

      Reply
  3. That is SOME distinction! In other words beyond LACVS, Educated Intelligence is 100% removed from the Chiropractic Objective and therefore practice of.

    Reply
  4. The vertebraille analysis of measuring ii directives within muscles as a means to detect subluxation seems to me is a symantic equal to “resultant measurable adaptation”.
    Seems at some point logical assumptions (educated) must be used to evaluate for physical (LAC) solutions to the interference of the expression of metaphysical creations, directives and laws.
    But with just a tad. Being in “the pocket”, in “the groove”, one with the PM, “present time”, “the moment”, The right intention, That extra something (philosophical understanding), ADIO, “the tightrope”
    Some might call it “dumbing down”. Less is more? “KISS”

    Reply
    • David,

      With all this very good (excellent) rhetoric… it is my hope that you are putting it in practice. It looks like you might JUMP OFF the fence after all. 😉

      Reply

Leave a Comment