It is amazing how little we are satisfied with in chiropractic. I once showed a video to a group of straight chiropractic students. The first part was a panel discussion on chiropractic by a group of mixers. It was an absolutely poor explanation of chiropractic. The second part was a better explanation of chiropractic. It used nerve interference instead of a strictly musculoskeletal approach. The problem was that it also missed the mark bya mile. However the students saw the relative merit of the second in comparison to the first. They would settle for the second because the first was so much worse. Yet the second would have ultimately taken the public just as afar of the field of straight of straight chiropractic as the first. Just in a different direction. June 30, 2010
