Research appears to be an attempt to reconcile our chiropractic philosophy with science. Shouldn’t we be reconciling science with our philosophy? What is the difference?
Research appears to be an attempt to reconcile our chiropractic philosophy with science. Shouldn’t we be reconciling science with our philosophy? What is the difference?
I think to change our philosophy by the caprices of science would be like building our house on sand. Look how much or often “science” has changed, just since our philosophy has existed.
I think it all depends upon which you see as reality/Truth. For me our Philosophy is the Truth that science must conform too.
I agree Joe