Almost every mechanical device/design is patterend after an organ or part of the human body. So after seeing how mechanical things mimic the design of the vitalistic innate intelligence of the body, we take a mechanistic approach to the body. That’s like seeing some children act as grownups and thinking to be grownups we need to act like children.
Hey Joe,
BJ wrote (Vol. 36) something similar, “There are
only 310 mechanical principles and movements on which every
movable patent is based. All are found in man. Man OUTSIDE has
conceived nothing new but what is IN MAN. EVIDENCE of
everything mechanical has been invented, tried, tested, developed IN
MAN. The Innate builder of and in living man is still the great
unknowable discovery. To study any product is to know type of producer it had. To know producer’s intellect is to know his product. To study
EVIDENCE of man is to understand intellect which produced him.”….
IMO It seems we are so fascinated by the product and our ability to effect it, we sometimes forget our real purpose is to help reestablish the intent of the producer.
Well said Steve!
Steve,
Yes, it is you WHO chose to say it very well. Thank you. –
– The “intent” is the INSTRUCTIVE INFORMATION (pri.8) created by universal intelligence (pri.1) and adapted by innate intelligence (pri.23) which is expressed by the active organization of matter (pri.21) manifesting motion (pri.15) in a coordinated manner (pri.32). It’s ALL about the LAW of LIFE (pri.20) which is the core value of the chiropractic objective. 🙂
… to say it more fluently:
The intent is the instructive information created by universal intelligence and adapted by innate intelligence which is expressed by the active organization of matter manifesting motion in a coordinated manner. It is the Law of Life in flow which is the core value of the chiropractic objective. 😉
… and further more, the instructive information is “coded” in a way that determines whether it is deconstructive or constructive depending on the limitations of the matter which the intelligence keeps in existence and/or in active organization. 🙂
Hey Claude,
Hang on a minute. Are you not putting the cart before the horse? When you say ” “coded” in a way……(depending) on the limitations of the matter”, it seems you are giving matter too much credit. Innate Intelligence, the code generator, is not restricted by matter(P.27), only it’s expression is (p.30). Force, the “code” carrier/transmitter is affected (P.28&29) by LOM as is the eventual material expression, but the code or intent is the same regardless. If you were to say coded in a way….depending on the need or status of or organizational level (P.22) of matter, then the triad retains it’s proper balance, no?
Steve,
Would innate intelligence create a force coded the same way for the body of a polar bear, a panther and a human in the middle of the North Pole? The force is intelligent intent which means instructive information does it not? Would you shake hand with a two year old the same way you would shake hand with a 250 lbs weight lifter?
… and make no mistake Steve, universal intelligence creates universal instructive information for the rock to be maintained in existence and for the O2 molecules, with different codes. That’s WHY it’s called the LAW of organization which implies intelligent intent varying according to the matter in which it works… limitations included.
Sorry Claude,
You’re probably right. I guess it is semantics. I would call that levels of organization not limits of matter.
Hey Claude,
Wouldn’t shaking hands be an educated function?
Steve,
Yes… with intelligent intent which is instructive information nevertheless.
Steve, shall we inquire, together without condemnation, into the nature of what you call “the intent of the producer”?
Hey Claude,
IMHO the “intent” of the producer is unknowable. Organization on such a grand scale as life, is beyond our understanding. I don’t believe we can or need to know the full breadth and width of all that Innate Intelligence does but we can assist in it’s fulfillment. The generation and expression of the producer’s intent, I have been taught , are not within our realm. Our goal is to help maintain continuity. For the sake of clarity we call the “intent” a Mental Impulse. The instructive information we assume is contained within the MI would transmit the “intent”.
Exactly Steve!!! The instructive information is coded within the mental impulse (IF/constructive) giving it intelligent direction. When VS occurs, it changes the character (code) of the impulse and reverts it back to a nerve impulse (UF/deconstructive) without intelligent direction. This in turns violates the principle of coordination (32). That’s WHY it is we WHO choose to practice the chiropractic objective. 🙂
Hey Claude,
When you say ….giving it…..it being nerve impulse?
Steve,
The function of innate intelligence is to adapt universal forces investing them with a NEW character (instructive information in code) and become innate forces (mental impulses) for use in the body so that all parts of the body will have coordinated action for mutual benefit.
… and “giving it”… it being: impulse of the “living thing”. In other words, the coded instructive information IS the mental impulse with intelligent direction. If the universal force is NOT adapted by the innate intelligence of the “living thing” OR is interfered with… by a concussion of forces, that force is deconstructive toward structural matter since the impulse of the “living thing” has NO intelligent direction. –
– For “living things”, ONLY adapted forces are constructive toward structural matter and the unadapted forces are deconstructive toward structural matter. –
– Let us inquire, together without condemnation, into the question: WHAT does it mean that unadapted forces are deconstructive toward structural matter?