Is "Being" a chiropractic construct , a theological one or both?
If it is chiropractic. it would be any living organism having an innate intelligence. A theological one a living human.
2 thoughts on “Is "Being" a chiropractic construct , a theological one or both?”
To me “Being” relates to existence or what Stephenson referred to as “life” in the 33 Principles. Following the deductive reasoning of the chiropractic principles, first there would be “Being/Existence/Life” and then there would be organic or human “Being/existence/Life. “
To me “Being” relates to existence or what Stephenson referred to as “life” in the 33 Principles. Following the deductive reasoning of the chiropractic principles, first there would be “Being/Existence/Life” and then there would be organic or human “Being/existence/Life. “
Jack,
Does not organic include all living organism, not only human organisms?