Is "Being" a chiropractic construct , a theological one or both?

2 thoughts on “Is "Being" a chiropractic construct , a theological one or both?”

  1. To me “Being” relates to existence or what Stephenson referred to as “life” in the 33 Principles. Following the deductive reasoning of the chiropractic principles, first there would be “Being/Existence/Life” and then there would be organic or human “Being/existence/Life. “

    Reply

Leave a Comment