The Emperor’s New Clothes is a famous fable. We all know the story of how con men convinced the emperor that they could make him a beautiful set of clothes that only really intelligent people could see. It worked well until a little boy, not expected to be brilliant, said what everyone else was thinking…the “clothes” were in fact no clothes at all!
Perhaps I have the mentality of a little boy but it seems to me that energy medicine (body/mind medicine, wholistic medicine, or the various names it goes by) may be in that category (locating, analyzing, and correcting something that’s really not there). We chiropractors should avoid any association with this practice. The real danger of energy medicine is that it has the same objective as allopathic medicine but with different trappings. When you look at allopathic medicine at least you can see its faults clearly – taking a manmade substance from the outside and expecting it to restore health on the inside. But energy medicine is insidious. It attempts to treat/cure a disease or its cause by some esoteric means and covers that attempt with a thin veneer of ADIO philosophy. That is even more dangerous than allopathy.
By its very description, it is medicine but somehow many chiropractors have adopted the practice. Why is that? It’s probably because chiropractic is focused on an immaterial principle which we call the “innate intelligence” of the body and an immaterial/material force called the “mental impulse.” So we have the focus on the immaterial as common ground with the energy medicine people. But that does not mean that we are on the same page.
Those involved with energy medicine believe, for example, that because we are developing more powerful microscopes and are able to see smaller and smaller forms of matter, that one day we will be able to see, or at least measure, the energy, force or the chi or whatever term the particular branch of mind/body healing chooses to call it. Just because we can perceive or demonstrate smaller and smaller bits of matter does not mean that we will one day be able to measure non-matter.
We accept the fact that we cannot see, or in any empirical way measure, the innate intelligence of the body. Nor can we measure the mental impulse (despite B.J’s attempts). The best that we can do is measure the nerve conduction that carries the mental impulse but that does not give us the message that the impulse carries any more than an untrained ear hearing the sound of a telegrapher’s keys tells you what it is saying.
Energy medicine is a mechanistic approach. Using the telegraph analogy, it is like assuming because you can strike the keys to produce the dots and dashes, you can send an intelligent message. A small child striking the keys on a computer keyboard may inadvertently spell a word now and then but there is no way that child will send a cogent message over the Internet. The energy medicine practitioner has no more expertise in restoring proper mental impulses than a child has writing Shakespeare. The chiropractor is not restoring the flow of energy. He is restoring the flow of information or more correctly removing an interference to the innate intelligence of the body restoring that flow at the vertebral level.
The energy medicine people point to the inability to see microbes (until relatively recent centuries) and those who erroneously concluded that since they couldn’t be seen, they didn’t exist. They maintain that one day we will be able to see or measure energy forces. The problem is that the mental impulse is not something that will one day be measured any more than we will one day be able to read peoples’ thoughts. That is what the mental impulse is…a thought of the innate intelligence of the body. For the sake of argument, even if we could one day identify the mental impulse, we are not doing it yet. It is foolish to treat a specific microbe before it is even identified. Of course, that is what medicine does even today, treating viruses with antibiotics. That is not what chiropractic is. Chiropractic is specific or it is nothing – B.J. Palmer.
Our philosophy is based upon deduction. We do not need empirical information when we have deduction, in those areas where deduction is applicable. But in the area where you need empirical linformation, like technique, you must have it. Otherwise you merely have unproven and unprovable theories.
That’s a difference between energy medicine and allopathic medicine. But more important is the difference between energy medicine and chiropractic. We can establish the physical misalignment of the bone… we can palpate the working muscle or the fixation. We have analyses that are empirical and we can see other physical changes in our criteria for the correction of vertebral subluxations-criteria that are not esoteric.
Chiropractic is based upon metaphysical assumptions but it is also based on tangible, material, scientific facts. It is the combination of that which can be discerned by deduction on the part of everyone and that which is empirical (physical) but can be seen and felt by anyone with the training. Energy medicine moves away from that mindset and supposedly can only be understood by those with special knowledge and special skills or those who have paid for and taken the course.
There is too much confusion and misunderstanding about chiropractic in the world today. We surely do not need to add another layer of mystery about the profession.
Hey Joe, Let’s not forget, DD started with energy (magnetic energy) then moved on to communication (nerves). Have you ever had the opportunity to check someone before and after an energy treatment. I say treatment because energy is a product and if you treat the product it is outside-in. Personally I’m a little leery of condemning something I don’t understand (as many do chiropractic) so let’s just say it is not Chiropractic and leave it at that.
Steve, DD left an outside in therapy and moved on to an ADIO approach. Energy medicine is outside-in. I think we have no need to condemn anything that is outside-in. It’s a whole different paradigm. But we need to discern between that which is ouside-in and that which is ADIO and then discern that which is ADIO and not chiropractic and that which is chiropractic (correcting VS). I would be happy to entertain an explanation of how energy medicine is ADIO.
The wondering into “things not Chiropractic” by the newer practitioners is simpley the result of graduation from Chiro College with vertually no ability to locate and correct VS ( most courses were replaced by CCE/ NBCE mandated medical courses) while having 150K of loans to pay. It is a money problem; not a Philosopy problem.
I agree that there is a money factor. But you and I had money issues when we graduated. Everybody does. (I remember you and your friends bought me a tie because I had to wear the same one every day). But we also had a philosophy, that, no matter what the circumstances would not allow us to wander into things not chiropractic. Most of our classmates were as good as us at LACVS, some probably better. But they wandered (most so far that they are “lost” today). Money is definitely and issue. But you bring to mind another important point. How many know from their philosophy how they should practice but don’t because of money? That is an integrity issue. If someone wanders because they believe getting into other areas is what is the best thing to do, I see that as a philosophy issue and can respect that difference in philosophy. If they do it for the money, knowing it is not chiropractic, that’s something else. But the point you are making is well taken, until the schools can balance out the outside-in teaching with an ADIO one, our graduates will continue to wander. Thanks for your thoughts.
Steve,
Don’t you think that making a distinction of facts is not condemning… simply clarifying? And if you see it as a condemnation of energy medicine, are you showing conflict within your own understanding?
Is it not possible that there are more ways to interfere with health than just interference with normal nerve transmission? i.e. energy transmission?
Perhaps restoring energy transmission is no more allopathic than restoring normal nerve function.
I think there are many things that interfere with health, like eating junk food, being a couch potato. Chiropractic only relates to one, interference with transmission of mental impulses due to vertebral subluxation. That is defining ourselves by our objective. There may even be some relating to nerve function like disc involvement and other lesions. They are medical conditions. I’m not sure what others you are referring to under “energy transmission” but we need to ask ourselves, for what reason are we restoring energy function. If it is to treat/cure a (medical) disease or its cause then it is not straight chiropractic as we define it.
I think Steve is onto something. Chiropractic and Energy Medicine have similar roots. Simon Senzon wrote a great article about it in 2008 in the Journal of Chiropractic Humanities. Everyone should check it out.
John, I’m not sure what “similar roots” you are referring to. Could you elaborate and also tell us where the JCH article you are referring to can be found. Thanks
John – it’s nice to see different names particpating here. after watching your video on your website, I see why you might think Steve might onto something. Do you really feel we as DCs should be the answer or source of everything health for the people we see??
If so, you have an interesting challenge ahead of you. Good luck.
Energy medicine is dangerous since it supposedly taps forces we should not be messing with. I like the analog of it may not be there but there are forces in the universe that respond to seekers. We need to be certain what we do has physical origins and physiological connections. I think we are right to pursue this since so many are trapped in this web of deceit. We cannot be the source of all but we need to point out error. The other mess that goes with this is “mind” medicine. The Secret and the positive thinking gurus also are sell the emperors new close. We need to speak out against this stuff since it confuses people when they see a chiropractor doing it.