Does the Major Premise connote creation as well as maintenance in existence
Yes or No? and Why?
11 thoughts on “Does the Major Premise connote creation as well as maintenance in existence”
The major premise is about Newton’s law of conservation of energy/matter. It is a continuum of configurations and velocities of electrons, protons and neutrons that maintain e/matter in existence.
We now know that matter is more dense energy in slow moving form and is never loss nor created either way. The key factor in the major premise is that universal intelligence is the law of organization that maintains everything in existence. Of course “everything” implies having been created… however this implication falls outside of chiropractic.
So, Claude you are saying that not only P#1 “falls outside of chiropractic” so does P # 8? If this is the case can we conclude that none of the 33 principles are truly the “basic science” of chiropractic.
Isn’t universal force created by universal intelligence? (P8).
Isn’t the expression from P1 >> “and continually gives to it”, an act of creating the forces (Laws) of the physical universe, thus implying the action, the event of Time?
with regard to your question:Does the Major Premise connote creation as well as maintenance in existence
Claude, i infer, said No, the major premise does not connote creation (see above).
My answer is Yes, with regard to metaphysical force, as per the 33Ps. With regard to creation of Matter. No, only Maintaining it in existence.
Who is correct? Who is wrong?
You were asking about creation being within a the major premise, as I understood it, and I said no. Yet the major premise was created… it didn’t just appear out of nowhere. The law of organization was created and that creative act falls outside of chiropractic. Principle 8 is about metaphysical intelligence creating metaphysical information. Metaphysical intelligence does NOT and I repeat does NOT create e/matter at all… since e/matter is purely physical and is NEVER destroyed nor created. Creation is going beyond the realm of Chiropractic.
You were asking about creation being within the major premise, as I understood it, and I said no. Yet the major premise was created… it didn’t just appear out of nowhere. The law of organization was created and that creative act falls outside of chiropractic. Principle 8 is about metaphysical intelligence creating metaphysical information. Metaphysical intelligence does NOT and I repeat does NOT create e/matter at all… since e/matter is purely physical and is NEVER destroyed nor created. Creation is going beyond the realm of Chiropractic.
I think that while the MP was “created” by BJ?RWS , it steps outside the realm of chiropractic philosophy and into the realm of theology, just as “getting sick people well” steps out of the realm of chiropractic and into the realm of medicine. Perhaps there is a “transitional principle” which is both theological/religious and chiropractic,just as there is a transitional principle that “unites”/separates universal matter/life (P# 2 thru 19), just as there is a transitional principle that “unites”/separates chiropractic and everything else and we can make that delineation we will have solved the problem that even BJ was not able to resolve.
The major premise is about Newton’s law of conservation of energy/matter. It is a continuum of configurations and velocities of electrons, protons and neutrons that maintain e/matter in existence.
We now know that matter is more dense energy in slow moving form and is never loss nor created either way. The key factor in the major premise is that universal intelligence is the law of organization that maintains everything in existence. Of course “everything” implies having been created… however this implication falls outside of chiropractic.
So, Claude you are saying that not only P#1 “falls outside of chiropractic” so does P # 8? If this is the case can we conclude that none of the 33 principles are truly the “basic science” of chiropractic.
Isn’t universal force created by universal intelligence? (P8).
Isn’t the expression from P1 >> “and continually gives to it”, an act of creating the forces (Laws) of the physical universe, thus implying the action, the event of Time?
And your point is….?
with regard to your question:Does the Major Premise connote creation as well as maintenance in existence
Claude, i infer, said No, the major premise does not connote creation (see above).
My answer is Yes, with regard to metaphysical force, as per the 33Ps. With regard to creation of Matter. No, only Maintaining it in existence.
Who is correct? Who is wrong?
Joseph,
You were asking about creation being within a the major premise, as I understood it, and I said no. Yet the major premise was created… it didn’t just appear out of nowhere. The law of organization was created and that creative act falls outside of chiropractic. Principle 8 is about metaphysical intelligence creating metaphysical information. Metaphysical intelligence does NOT and I repeat does NOT create e/matter at all… since e/matter is purely physical and is NEVER destroyed nor created. Creation is going beyond the realm of Chiropractic.
Perhaps the question more specifically should read “Does the Major Premise connote creation of matter as well as maintenance of matter in existence”??
That seems to be the discussion/disagreement between TSC and OSC.
Joseph,
You were asking about creation being within the major premise, as I understood it, and I said no. Yet the major premise was created… it didn’t just appear out of nowhere. The law of organization was created and that creative act falls outside of chiropractic. Principle 8 is about metaphysical intelligence creating metaphysical information. Metaphysical intelligence does NOT and I repeat does NOT create e/matter at all… since e/matter is purely physical and is NEVER destroyed nor created. Creation is going beyond the realm of Chiropractic.
I think that while the MP was “created” by BJ?RWS , it steps outside the realm of chiropractic philosophy and into the realm of theology, just as “getting sick people well” steps out of the realm of chiropractic and into the realm of medicine. Perhaps there is a “transitional principle” which is both theological/religious and chiropractic,just as there is a transitional principle that “unites”/separates universal matter/life (P# 2 thru 19), just as there is a transitional principle that “unites”/separates chiropractic and everything else and we can make that delineation we will have solved the problem that even BJ was not able to resolve.
So Joseph, what is YOUR answer to your question and why?