Cellular Intelligence

This is a concept that BJ never addressed, if he felt it existed at all, and a number of chiropractors have criticized my presentation of it and the ramifications it has on the mental impulse, safety pin and normal complete cycles as well as a few other chiropractic philosophical issues, like whether a mother and fetus each have their own innate intelligence. If there is a cellular intelligence (ii of the cell), and I lean in that direction, it is perfect by its definition, just as the innate intelligence of the body is perfect in all its qualities and attributes. Therefore, for all practical purposes, they are the same. Both have the same mission (principle No.21) to maintain the matter of a living organism in active organization. One is doing it to the components of the cell, the other to the organs, tissues and cells of the body. Two things equal to the same thing are equal to each other. Innate intelligence is omnipresent, in every cell of the body. So those who say there is no cellular intelligence (ci) are correct in the sense that looking at the manifestation of innate intelligence in the cell, its manifestation would be exactly like that of the innate intelligence of the body. There would be no perceptible difference. So, in a perfectly functioning body the expression of cellular intelligence is not being perceived. It and the innate intelligence of the body are the same. The only time cellular intelligencei is perceived is when the innate intelligence of the body is no longer being expressed in the cell. That can only occur in two situations:
1. When the cell has been removed from the body and is still alive.
2. When there is an interference to the expression of the innate intelligence of the body due to, say VS. In that case the ci is all that is being expressed and it is just functioning for itself. It fits the chiropractic understanding of a cancer cell. If the interference is removed, it is once again expressing/manifesting ONLY the innate intelligence of the body.
Conclusion:
It is probably more correct to say that a cell expresses the innate intelligence of the body rather than expresses cellular intelligence unless and until one of the two above states occurs. Then we can say that the cell expresses ci. While this may be more acceptable to those who do not accept the concept of cellular intelligence (because BJ never addressed it), it does not affect the idea that the innate intelligence is in every cell and not located in the brain, being expressed through the nerve system to a cell that without that expression would have no life, as BJ apparently maintained. The cell without the expression of the innate iintelligence of the body would still have intelligence being expressed through its matter but it would be cellular intelligence through the much more limited matter of the cell (there is strength in numbers). Hence, the concepts of the mental impulse and the normal complete cycle based upon innate intelligence being located in the brain still need to be re-examined.