Active organization refers to principle No. 21, the mission of innate intelligence. While there is active organization on the atomic level (the motion of electrons), it is generally confined to the interaction of cells for the good of the entire organism. So it is not ordinarily used in referring to the expression of universal intelligence. Perhaps because there were no electron microscopes in 1927.
So the adapting of universal forces and matter for use in the body, investing of universal forces with new character is what is deduced to take place at the atomic level, NOT only at the cellular level?
Thus ths electron microscope might, in theory be able allow for descerning innate intelligence in action, atomically.
And yes, macroscopically, the signs of life illustrate active organization at work?
David,
No!!!! NOT so!!! For use in the body (pri23) is ONLY at the parts levels (cells, organs, systems, etc) of the body of the “LIVING THING”. This is HOW all parts of the LIVING body will have coordinated action for mutual benefit (pri23 and 32). –
– As Joseph mentioned in his opening post, the sole ACT of the law of organization IS to give to e/matter all of its properties and actions by creating information (pri8) that unites intelligence and e/matter (pri10)… in order to maintain e/matter in existence (pri1) which is the union of intelligence and e/matter (pri3). –
– The mission of innate intelligence is to maintain the material of the body of a “living thing” in active organization simply means “to keep the STRUCTURE of e/matter of the body of the living thing ALIVE, INCLUDING ALL levels of organization (cells, organs, systems, etc). –
– Joseph’s statement is a very good example of the understanding of the time of DD, BJ and RWS at their respective level of consciousness. Today’s NEW information (electron microscope, et al) has given rise to a consciousness that evokes a refined understanding of the 33 principles of chiropractic’s basic science. –
– The expression of the perfection of the triune (I-F-M) exists ONLY at the level of existence. That is the reason WHY, that without my tonsils, I remain ALIVE with less than perfection of the structural e/matter of my body. That is WHY the volcanic eruptions, atomic bombs and the vortex particle separator can deconstruct the bonds of “non-living” by-products of molted elements and re-construct them into NEW structural forms… like lava). –
– It is important to remain open to the NEW information that gives rise to a NEW refined understanding of the genius of the 33 principles of chiropractic’s basic science.
Joes statement, as I understand IS,
As per:’So it is not ordinarily used in referring to the expression of universal intelligence. Perhaps because there were no electron microscopes in 1927′,
That active organization, as existing in living things reaches its parts.
You have drawn a line of coordinated activities to stop at the cell.
Joe seems to suggest, that by looking at the parts of the cell, to the parts of the parts, that while UI is that which organizes non-living matter, that LIVING MATTER is adapted Universal Matter.
It’s of the matter but apart from the matter, as reflected as what we call Life.
First of all, I’m not trying to be wrong, or right. I’m taking what is presented here and attempting to go deeper, without breaking a physical law, or a principle that we have established as part of the 33Ps.
When there is an adaptation of universal forces, investing with new character, are you promalgating that universal force, universal matter only reaches as far as the confines of what we call A CELL?
Ii controlling the cells of the organism, allowing mutual benefit, allowing a fulfillment of their offices and purposes?
It goes no further?
When one assimilates a drug, a chemical into their body, that universal matter and force, is not adapted, invested with new character, to become an innate force within a living system?
And if not, then that would constitute a LOM, and therefore remain a universal force?
I agree with your analysis if that’s the level of organization, the cell, you are stating to be in context with the 33Ps.
But as I understand, or seemed to understand, perhaps wrongly, fine, at least I’m thinking on my own and not just following the Traditions that YOU might be setting (aka BJ, DD) and the quagmire of their followers intentions.
I read Joes post a bit different. Perhaps he can clarify, or if you care to, explain, where universal matter becomes innate matter and where innate matter becomes universal matter or no longer takes the properties of LIFEs adaptive essenses
The nuclearation and crystallization of inorganic and organic e/matter were posted as a possibility of their interface two and half years ago… as YOU questioned where” the interface occurred between inorganic and organic”. Re-read that thread and you might discover NEW insights into your thinking. 😉
I shall.
Just to note. In Joes The Pivot Review 1998-2003, p130, article, Innate forces, line 6, he states:
‘That is the function of the innate intelligence of life and it uses innate forces to accomplish this purpose. These forces are the power and the messages that the innate intelligence use to build atomic particles into the elements, the elements into chemical compounds, the compounds into the component parts of a cell, the cell into a tissue, then an organ and eventually into a living organism….Every living organism has these innate forces. They are the means by which the innate intelligence of life controls and coordinates the function of the body’s MATERIAL SUBSTANCES(my emphasis) and life itself.’
****************
I understand this is a suggested share with PMs, so 100% accuracy may not be required (eg. More of a teaching tool)
Also you Claude have alluded to the ‘universal cycle of life’ to encompass ALL MATTER.
Anyway you haven’t addressed my distinction between non living atomic matter and living atomic matter as implicated in this post or at least something that POPPED into my head.
Be that as it may, I will look for for your reference.
‘May The Force Be With You’ 😉 ADIO
This distinction has been extensively addressed in the past. 😉
I’m looking but can’t find exactly.
I’ve saved many many posts. Looking up crystallization and nuclearation I find nothing.
Extensively enough where you still hold on to a
‘Not So’?
Fair enough. Didn’t really think that innate matter broken down to its elements where properties and actions are being defined within a Living Organism would exclude ii from its selfish normal activities.
If the day comes when I can agree to disagree about perhaps a minor point within, chiropractic philosophy, with the likes of professors and scholars Joe Strauss and Claude Lessard I’ll know I’m on my way to my normal expression in alignment with my educated intelligence, and chiropractic will be the better for it, including myself.
Then again, I’m only looking for a truth that is in my heart and soul from the moment I wake up to the moment I sleep, so that I can be congruent and do what I MUST DO, and that is get far away from this stinking, out ethic, ridiculously loathsome workplace environment that pays the bills, but is wasting my precious good life on.
Go ADIO and God help me. 😉
Chiropractic is INCLUSIVE of everyone regardless of creeds or beliefs. In other words, chiropractic is INCLUSIVE of any truth that is in your heart and soul. You have been sitting on the fence for a long time now. Take a stand and you WILL NOT be “wasting your precious good life on”. 😉
… in other words, when you post statements like: “If the day comes…” and “Then again, I’m only looking for… so that…” these are statements that keep you on the fence and will keep you there until you realize that it is you WHO are FREE to choose to STAND for something or FALL for anything.